Monday, 11 June 2012

NSW Farmers let Down…..Again!


                NSW Farmers let Down…..Again! 



Do the following industries (and many more!) not contribute enough to qualify?



Will perusing through my emails earlier today, I had one from NSW Farmers with an attachment. It was their response to the release of the NSW Budget where regional and remote NSW has missed out again. It’s disheartening when there is so much that regional and rural NSW contribute to the nation, and they continually get let down, not only in this state but across the country.

The Government’s claims about doing up country roads was in fact mostly directed to major highways; $3.8 million of it. Rarely can the majority of the state have access to the benefit of these upgrades, as important as they might be.

It was also disappointing to note that no allocation for R & D was made, despite that for every $1 invested, $10 is shown in return. One such example of the consequences of the cut to R & D is the closing of the doors for Beef CRC, which contributes phenominal resources and funding for research projects for the Australian Beef industry and indeed around the globe. Other avenues have been opened up and supported for the arts, social sciences and humanities fields by the government where other avenues for funding are available as a stark contrast for the agricultural based CRC's, where they are not. It is hoped that the existing projects can 'get by' and fund themselves until further funding may be acquired within the next six months...maximum. Hopefully such places as the Department of Primary Industries will come on board, because without them, these projects simply can't go on. It is disappointing when so much money is sent overseas for R &D when organisations in our own living room can't get any. 

$80 million will be spent in Myanmar to aid children to finish primary school, train more teachers, supply textbooks and food for those that attend school, $19.5 million will go to addressing poverty in Asia over a 3 year contract and a further $25 million will go to the World Food Programme to aid in alleviating hunger in the developing world. I am not saying that these initiatives aren't important. I do however pose the question, that with the current homelessness rate in Australia estimated to be 105000 people at any given night alone, do we not have an obligation to not only find homes for these people but to also find them jobs so they can sustain themselves. In the last 25 years, the amount of 'boat-people' or 'asylum seekers', has jumped from 111 to almost 5000 per year, where we are happy to keep them in detention centres, providing them with food, water and shelter. Providing much more than to those of our own on the streets. And couldn't some of those funds go towards supporting our nation and the very industries that uphold its backbone?

“Agriculture is an important contributor to the NSW economy. It generates more than $8.4 billion annually and employs 74,000 people full time. More importantly, it is the backbone of thousands of rural communities throughout NSW.”

With these figures, why can’t the NSW regional, rural and remote communities get a break? They might  just simply start packing their bags...

 

2 comments:

  1. Food for thought. While I totally agree it is continually disappointing and frustrating that our city cousins always seem to get the better end of the deal when it comes budget time - I am always confused when people relate this to sending money to overseas aid. I'm not sure if you've ever been to Myanmar but over there the women and children build roads with bags of stones and sand... and soldiers watch over them with machine guns at hand, and tourists aren't allowed to take photos of this because they'll be prosecuted. 99 times out of 100 I would support money going to overseas aid. The EASIEST way to stop boat people from arriving on our shores (which costs billions upon billions once they get here for all the time and effort it takes to "process" them and keep them fed and houses while that happens) is to send money to overseas aid and help fix their countries so they no longer want to come here.
    In my opinion, when it comes to talking about taking money from somewhere and allocating it to farming and rural and region areas - the best place to start would be that hefty pay rise politicians seems to be able to give themselves every year. Another place we could start is the millions wasted on people who are perfectly capable of working, but chose to get government handouts instead. And going further - I drove through a regional town the other day that had a new Police Station and Ambulance station that were completely architecturally designed - how about we just build a normal looking building instead, save a few bucks on design and materials, and use the rest where it's really needed? The same could be said for upgrades to footy fields, airports etc....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good point. As I said, I didn't believe they weren't important initiatives. I do however believe that we should try and help those here first though or at least alongside.
      Yes, there are many ways that within ourselves, we could assist with where money is spent. And perhaps that is where it should start...Goodluck trying to cut their pay packet though..

      Delete